It is especially touching when the DSP Builder point blank does not notice the installed Matlab and at least what do you do!īut the author for himself found a very stable bunch. With the ensuing dances with incompatibility of versions and some completely strange inconsistencies. The second reason is a bunch of three very heterogeneous programs and environments.
And the former can’t understand why they need this “builder” (and there’s also some kind of Simulink!), And the latter sculpt the algorithms and say “their implementation is none of my business!” (a real picture from one famous domestic office). Such specialists are piece-wise and have three-digit zp.
True, this can be partially explained by the fact that quite rarely specialists are well versed in plisovodstvo and signal processing. Moreover, this attitude to DSP Builder is especially incomprehensible against the background of enthusiastic reviews towards Active HDL shells. For some reason, it is believed that DSP Builder is "for students." The situation is just like with Delphi. The first is a somewhat contemptuous attitude of harsh plisovodov to this product. In my opinion, this situation was created for two reasons. But it’s strange, because DSP Builder is almost a revolution unnoticed by anyone in the field of FPGA construction. To my surprise, I did not find a single article on Habr dedicated to DSP Builder (maybe it was a bad search?).
0 kommentar(er)
